Thursday, September 28, 2006

  Posted by Picasa

My Heart is Broken in Pieces

Can it be that the republic once known as "The United States of America" has died?
It sure feels as if it has.We are no longer a nation of laws or international treaties. We now live under a fascist dictatorship with no reins to hold them back.
I know it all started with a coup when I was still a child,the day they killed Kennedy in Dallas...somehow I was hoping it would right itself. It never did. Our so-called representatives in both houses today shredded all restraints on the Bush Family Evil Empire,Mike Malloy is off the air,the North American Union is in full swing,KRB is building detention camps in the US for the "free speech zone meets 'enemy combatants' to join hands to sing 'Give Peace a Chance'.Gawd.......

Sunday, September 24, 2006

  Posted by Picasa
  Posted by Picasa
More Evidence “al-Qaeda” is a CIA-ISI Contrivance
Friday September 22nd 2006, 7:32 am

Don’t expect our corporate media “op-ed” stenographers to deviate from their Pentagon and neocon generated scripts and connect the dots now that another in-your-face link between “al-Qaeda” terrorism and state-sponsored terrorism (one in the same) has surfaced.

“Omar Khyam, an accused leader among seven men charged in 2004 with stockpiling half a ton of explosives in an Al Qaeda-linked bombing plot, took the stand Tuesday long enough to refuse to continue his testimony. The judge temporarily adjourned the trial, which began in March,” reports the Los Angeles Times. “On Monday, Khyam stunned his own lawyer when he declared that his relatives in Pakistan had been intimidated in recent days by agents of the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency, which has a shadowy history of contacts with Islamic extremist networks.”

No mention here of the “shadowy” fact the ISI is a branch office of the CIA. “A number of officers from the ISI’s Covert Action Division received training in the US and many covert action experts of the CIA were attached to the ISI to guide it in its operations against the Soviet troops by using the Afghan Mujahideen, Islamic fundamentalists of Pakistan and Arab volunteers,” writes B. Raman for the South Asia Analysis Group. These “Arab volunteers” and “Islamic fundamentalists,” of the most virulent strain (Saudi Wahhabism), are now known as “al-Qaeda,” a wily and phantasmal enemy specifically designed to serve as a forever enemy, an elusive Goldsteinesque enemy explicitly engineered to pose a threat in perpetuum.

“Despite longtime allegations that Pakistani agents have trained Islamic militants and protected fugitive Al Qaeda leaders, Khyam’s testimony provided a rare account in a Western courtroom about the ISI’s role in militant training camps,” the Times continues. “His accusation also raised concerns that Pakistani intelligence officials might be seeking to disrupt a significant prosecution of alleged Islamic extremism in Europe.”

Of course, this stands to reason, as “Islamic extremism,” long ago blueprinted on a CIA drawing board, has demonstrated its transcendent usefulness and must be protected at all cost. One miserable patsy will not get in the way and no doubt Omar Khyam’s family is now in danger, thanks to his detrimental revelation.

“If the allegations about intimidation are true, they raise troubling implications for the trial and the other pending cases involving British suspects of Pakistani origin with alleged connections to terrorist networks in Pakistan—as well as family ties there.”

According to Jane’s Information Group, the ISI “was modelled on Savak, the Iranian security agency, and like Savak was trained by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the SDECE, France’s external intelligence service.” SAVAK, according to Sam Ghandchi, who experienced the secret police’s brutality firsthand, specialized in shoving broken bottles in the rectums of political dissidents, murdering “pregnant activists, and all other forms of killing and rape.” SAVAK was a law unto itself, possessing the legal authority to arrest, detain, interrogate, and torture dissidents indefinitely. SAVAK operated its own prisons in Tehran, such as the Qezel-Qalaeh and Evin facilities. Because it operated autonomously, without checks and balances, it serves as a standard-bearer for secret police around the world.

“Kashmir, along with Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Russian republic of Chechnya, is one of the battlegrounds that has provided a multinational flow of aspiring Islamic militants to Al Qaeda and its allies,” the Times reports, once again neglecting to connect the dots.

For instance, as Michel Chossudovsky notes, the “Bosnian pattern,” as described in a Republican Party Committee congressional report published in 1997, “was replicated in Kosovo” with “the complicity of NATO and the US State Department. Mujahideen mercenaries [recruited, trained, and financed by the CIA and ISI] from the Middle East and Central Asia were recruited to fight in the ranks of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in 1998-99, largely supporting NATO’s war effort…. Confirmed by British military sources, the task of arming and training of the KLA had been entrusted in 1998 to the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and Britain’s Secret Intelligence Services MI6, together with ‘former and serving members of 22 SAS [Britain’s 22nd Special Air Services Regiment], as well as three British and American private security companies.” This pattern was also put to work in Macedonia and Chechnya.

Omar Khyam has revealed but another glimmer of the precise nature of the “al-Qaeda” terror network, information useful for connecting dots but that will of course be studiously ignored by our corporate media stenographers. “Khyam has revealed more information than was expected,” remarked Sajjan Gohel of the Asia-Pacific Foundation, billed as a counter-terrorism think tank. “He has given a lot of insight into how very many British Muslims have been recruited…. I think everyone was shocked. The question now is whether the whole truth will come out.”

Of course, it does not matter if “the whole truth will come out,” as it is irrelevant, especially for a society unable to connect the dots and, really, not wanting to connect the dots and learn the truth, as this particular truth interupts sit-coms and football games.

For every person who looks beyond the official story and gleans the indisputable truth about “al-Qaeda” and various other intelligence contrivances engineered by the Pentagon, CIA, MI-6, Mossad, et al, there are literally millions of people who buy into the official explanation, or rather Brothers Grimm machination—the Muslims, represented by the dead Osama and al-Zarqawi, are out to get us and an incessant “clash of civilizations” is required, with attendant police state and tyranny at home.

Indeed, the “whole truth,” according to our neocon rulers, is nothing less than base “appeasement” of “bad guys,” those who wish us harm. Soon enough, especially after the imminent shock and awe of Iran, espousing the truth will result in Gestapo door knocks—with battering rams manned by ninja-clad thugs tossing stun grenades—at three in the morning, thus shuffling “fifth columnists,” as Sen. Lindsey Graham would likely describe the readers of this blog, off to Rex 84 camps where waterboarding and secret military tribunals are the order of the day.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

The Planting of a Nightmare
September 19, 2006

Two Resolutions Eliminating the Two Term Presidency Limit; the Planting of a Nightmare?

By Michael Bonanno

Two proposed congressional bills are intended to repeal the twenty-second amendment of The U. S. Constitution. They are House Resolution 9, sponsored by Democrat Jos� E. Serrano of New York and House Resolution 24, sponsored by Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, also a Democrat.

The twenty-second amendment states:

"Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress."

Hoyer's bill is bipartisan. Republican radical right wing congressman F. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin is co-sponsoring Resolution 24.

Serrano and Hoyer have been working on repealing the twenty-second amendment since the Presidency of Bill Clinton. It's plausible that they wanted to extend Clinton's presidency and now must "prove" that their intentions were nonpartisan.

In introducing HJ Res 24, Hoyer stated that "though I am not a supporter of the current President, I feel there are good public policy reasons for a repeal of this amendment. Under the Constitution as altered by the 22nd Amendment, this must be President George W. Bush's last term even if the American people should want him to continue in office. This is an undemocratic result."

Is the "undemocratic result" of which Hoyer speaks worth giving The Regime, possibly the least Democratic leadership this country has ever had, a legal route by which to cheat their way to a more terms? Changing the twenty-second amendment is far too dangerous.

The twenty-second amendment was passed in 1951 after FDR had been elected four times between 1933-1945. Roosevelt died shortly after his fourth term began.

Part of the reason Roosevelt was elected four times was to maintain consistency of leadership during World War II. That conflict had specific goals which, when met, would signal the end of the war.

Members of The Regime warn that the so called war on terrorism is a "different kind of war". The enemy can be anywhere at any time, doesn't represent a nation state and doesn't wear a uniform. The number of enemy "combatants" is unknown. Consequently, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to gauge when the "war on terrorism" is over.

If Resolution 9 or 24 succeed, The Regime could remain in power indefinitely citing the importance of seamless leadership during times of "war".

Following what happened on September 11, 2001, this country invaded Iraq. If the official narrative of the events of 9/11 is true, it constitutes a crime committed by 19 hijackers, none of them Iraqi, not a declaration of war.

The logical reaction to 9/11 would have been to hunt down and capture the remaining Al Qaeda criminals. Invading Iraq was the wrong response.

However, The Regime claims that the invasion of Iraq is part of the "war on terror", not a response to a crime. Therefore, a case could be made for "seamless leadership during war time". Repealing the twenty-second amendment could appear to "make sense".

If the amendment isn't repealed before November of 2008, there's another method The Regime could use to extend its term in office. It would involve the threat of a terrorist attack.

The Regime has tried to keep us in constant fear and the mainstream media is controlled by Regime supporters. Controlling the Homeland Security Advisory System color chart is a powerful function and it's come in handy for The Regime in the past. The Regime's media would gladly cover a "legitimate and imminent threat" of a terrorist attack on US soil in October or November of 2008.

The Regime can then place the nation under Martial Law and the Commander and Chief of the military can delay the election indefinitely to "protect the safety of the American people".

George W. Bush, The Regime's Front Man, and its leader, Dick Cheney, make reference to September 11, 2001 when that reference aids their cause. At times, they appear to be all too willing to stay in office well beyond January of 2009. Bush's recent statement that only he, not some future president, can successfully execute a conflict with Iran reinforces the idea of a "postponed" presidential election.

The following is the Definition of Martial Law
"Military rule or authority imposed on a civilian population when the civil authorities cannot maintain law and order, as in a time of war or during an emergency."

Using Executive Orders is not new to The Regime, but here are a few that may be utilized by The Regime after it declares Martial Law. These Executive Orders can be found in the House of Representatives Law Library.

Executive Order 10995: All communications media are to be seized by the Federal Government. Radio, TV, newspapers, CB, Ham, telephones, and the internet will be under federal control. Hence, the First Amendment will be suspended indefinitely.

Executive Order 10997: All electrical power, fuels, and all minerals will be seized by the federal government.

Executive Order 10998: All food resources, farms and farm equipment will be seized by the government.

Executive Order 10999: All modes of transportation will go into government control. Any vehicle can be seized.

Executive Order 11000: All civilians can be used for work under federal supervision.

Executive Order 11490: Establishes presidential control over all US citizens, businesses, and churches in time of "emergency."

Executive Order 12919: Directs various Cabinet officials to be constantly ready to take over virtually all aspects of the US economy during a State of National Emergency at the direction of the president.

One may say that this opinion serves to spread the kind of fear which we blame The Regime for spreading.

If The Regime can use fear to keep itself in power, either by skewing the truth or by abusing its present power to ensure the perpetuation of its "term", this article can serve as a reminder that too many Americans still adamantly support The Regime.

Hopefully, Congress and/or The Supreme Court will find the courage to confront The Regime if it tries to pull this off.

Authors Website:

Authors Bio: Michael Bonanno is a published poet and musician who lives in the San Fransisco Bay Area.

He's had two essays published by the Dana Literary Society.

His album, "Flameland", is for sale at CD Baby. It includes a dedication to Casey Sheehan called "Casey's Song".

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's necessary for our government to help the needy. He adamantly believes that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide. Bonanno is well aware of what "the private sector" does with its power and money.


Friday, September 08, 2006

  Posted by Picasa


Friday, September 08, 2006
It’s good to see at long last that the mainstream media (MSM) are beginning to publish articles about the so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ that surround the events of 9/11 – even if they are in an attempt to debunk them. It means that if the MSM is going to so much trouble to debunk them then the truth about what really happened that fateful day is finally beginning to emerge into the public domain and that the western governments who have an interest in maintaining the façade of the ‘official version’ of events are becoming worried that their story is coming apart at the seams.

Of course, the present spate of articles in the MSM are designed to reinforce the statements that President Bush recently made when trying to shore up his support for the continued ‘war against terror’.[1]

In one recent article in the UK Telegraph by Michael Shelden one can almost sense the desperation in his narrative as he tries to dissuade readers from believing the claims of Dr. Steven E. Jones, the university physics professor from Utah who is a leading light in the 9/11 Scholars for Truth movement, that the twin towers of the World Trade Center could not have collapsed solely because aircraft had crashed in to them and that, therefore, there must have been some kind of conspiracy involved in order that a secondary cause for the towers collapse could be effected. Shelden doesn’t attempt to debunk Jones’ assertion but, instead, tries to belittle Jones by referring to some of Jones’ other non-related theories about religious characters in Mexican history, etc.[2]

Then there is Alexander Cockburn’s attempt to do a similar job on Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor.[3] Cockburn in his piece in The Nation attempts to frame Griffin’s synopsis of what happened on 9/11 within the notion that Griffin has a “…devout, almost preposterous belief in American efficiency”, inadvertently inferring that it was American inefficiency that allowed the attacks to happen.[4]

Meanwhile, Abraham H. Foxman of the pro right-wing Zionist Anti-Defamation League writes, predictably, in the Jewish News Weekly of Northern California that conspiracy theories about 9/11 are anti-Semitic. He bases this assertion on the fact that it was reported that many Israeli employees at the WTC did not attend work that day because they had been warned of the possibility of an attack. “This outrageous lie”, Foxman says, “took off like wildfire and became the centerpiece of the conspiracy theory that is accepted by millions of people in the Islamic world, and others around the globe, that it was Israel and the Jews, not al Qaida, that perpetrated the terrorist event of Sept. 11, 2001.”[5] We need, so Foxman seems to think, to know this because not only have millions of people in the Islamic world got a few doubts about the official version of events but now so have millions of people throughout the western world and, indeed, in growing numbers across the US. The latest figures show that over a third of Americans now believe that there is a lot more to the 9/11 story than the official government version would have us believe as the new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll shows.[6]

The governments of the coalition of the willing and their compliant and supportive mainstream media are getting worried. We can expect to see a lot more of these types of articles appearing in the MSM trying desperately to debunk so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ and, of course, the more they try then the more likelihood there is that people that were previously not interested in conspiracy theories and were content with the official version will now be wondering if there isn’t something in these stories after all!

[1] ‘Strategy for winning the war on terror’, White House statement, September 2006. Available online: Accessed 8 September 2006.
[2] Michael Shelden, ‘The CIA couldn’t have organized this…’, Telegraph, 8 September 2006. Available online: Accessed 8 September 2006.
[3] David Ray Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press, 2004.)
[4] Alexander Cockburn, ‘The 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts’, The Nation, 7 September 2006. Available online: Accessed 8 September 2006.
[5] Abraham H. Foxman, ‘9/11 conspiracy theories take root in Arab/Muslim world’, The Jewish News Weekly of Northern California, 8 September 2006. Available online: Accessed 8 September 2006.
[6] Thomas Hargrove, ‘Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy’,, 1 August 2006. Available online: Accessed 5 September 2006.

Monday, September 04, 2006

Death:Made in Amerikka

Voice of the Whitehouse

The Voice of the White House

Washington, D.C. August 31, 2006: “We have had a number of incompetent Presidents but beyond any doubt, George W. Bush is the worst. Aside from his compulsive, and easily exposed lies, let us consider Bush’s failures of his global war plans. Note: Portions of this material have previously been published on the Internet and in the foreign press but rarely addressed in the captive American media

Five years after Bush ordered Afghanistan invaded and, true to form, smugly announced a complete U.S. military victory, US, and a very small number of ‘Allies” allied forces are struggling on a daily basis to defend their bases and supply lines against rising attacks from a growing number of Afghan resistance groups. The war in both Iraq and Afghanistan costs the American taxpayer $1.5 billion monthly. As an added bonus, US-ruled Afghan now produces over 80% of the world’s heroin. The US just quietly deployed thousands more troops to Afghanistan to hunt al-Qaida leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri in a desperate attempt to save Republicans from heavy losses in November mid-term elections.

Remember Fat Karl Rove’s grotesque "Mission accomplished!" in Iraq? President Bush’s war in Iraq is clearly lost, but few dare admit it. The US has spent over $300 billion in taxpayer’s money on Afghanistan and Iraq, with nothing to show in either theater but chaos, civil war, body bags, and growing Iranian influence in Iraq and western Afghanistan. The Bush/Cheney "liberation" of Iraq has now cost more than the Vietnam War. So much for the "cakewalk." Iraq is likely the biggest American foreign policy disaster in living memory – even worse, in many ways, than Vietnam.

Down in the strategic Horn of Africa, another dangerous fiasco is unfolding. The White House had CIA and Pentagon have spent tens of millions of U.S. taxpayer’s money bribing Somali warlords to fight Islamist reformers trying to bring law and order to their strife-ravaged nation. The Islamists whipped CIA-backed warlords and ran them out of Somalia. Following this defeat, the US has encouraged and financed ally Ethiopia – shades of Lebanon – to invade Somalia, thus raising the threat of a wider war between Somalia, Ethiopia, and its old foe, Eritrea. Meanwhile, growing numbers of US Special Forces and CIA teams are getting drawn into obscure tribal mêlées in the Horn of Africa and the Saharan regions.

Lebanon is, of course, the fourth major American military disaster. Bush and Cheney encouraged Israel to launch the hugely destructive but militarily fruitless war in Lebanon as the first part of their long-nurtured plan to militarily crush Hezbullah, Syria and Iran. The Bush Administration brazenly thwarted world efforts to halt the conflict while giving Israel the green light to tear apart Lebanon. Now, just over a month later, Bush announces he will send $230 million to "help rebuild" Lebanon – the same Lebanon blasted apart by US smart bombs rushed by air to Israel by a sycophantic Bush. That the UN has condemned the use of these bombs is, of course, of no interest to either Bush or his opposite numbers in Israel

To Washington and Tel Avis’s, horror, Iran, and Syria emerged the war’s victors. Hezbollah is now the Muslim World’s new hero after battling Israel’s mighty armed forces to a humiliating draw. Even Syria’s President Bashar Asad, who played dead during the Lebanon War in fear of an Israeli attack, is now thumping his chest and crowing that Syria played a major role in the unexpected Arab victory.

Hezbollah’s triumph thwarted, at least for the moment, Bush/Cheney plans to attack Lebanon, Syria and Iran. The US and Israel have become so used to smashing nearly helpless foes armed with obsolete weapons – like Iraq, Taliban, or Palestine – that they were stunned to meet a force that had modern arms and could actually fight.

No sooner had bombing stopped than Hezbullah bulldozers were busy clearing rubble, and Hezbullah social workers resettling refugees. Perhaps President Bush should ask Hezbullah to take over rebuilding New Orleans and resettling all its refugees.

Israelis have now turned from fighting Arabs to furious finger-pointing. Politicians and generals are blaming each other for the Lebanon debacle that killed over eleven hundred 118 Israeli soldiers and 41 civilians, cost at least $6 billion, ruined the summer tourist trade, and, after a burst of initial sympathy, brought worldwide condemnation. And no captured soldiers – this war’s supposed objective – have been yet returned.

By turning a routine border skirmish into a big war, Israel’s PM Ehud Olmert showed he had no more grasp of military affairs than those other amateur warlords, Bush, Cheney and Tony Blair. Lebanon also showed that the western leaders learned nothing from their debacle in Iraq.

Now, some Washington hawks are wondering if invading Iran may not be the "cakewalk" that pro-Israel neoconservatives blithely promised. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards helped train and arm Hezbullah’s victorious fighters. Suddenly, neither the Israelis nor the Americans look so invincible. As Napoleon said, in war, the moral is to the physical as three to one.

America was the big loser in the Lebanon war. From Morocco to Indonesia, each night 1.5 billion Muslims watched the carnage in Lebanon on TV and blamed America. Even the poorest shepherd in Uzbekistan heard the US was airlifting the precision bombs and deadly cluster munitions to Israel used against Lebanese civilians.

Any hope of damping down the Islamic World’s surging hatred of the US, Britain, Australia and Israel (now add Canada) was killed in Lebanon. Even the interestingly-timed airport hysteria in London over alleged bomb plots failed to divert attention from the latest US-British Mideast policy disaster.

Yet the White House still keeps listening to absurd military advice from the same fanatically pro-Israel neoconservatives thirsting for conquest, oil and Muslim blood. Undaunted even by the fiasco in Lebanon, the Bush/Cheney White House is now heading into a full-blown crisis with Iran over its nuclear enrichment program.

As far as the civilian, domestic disasters, one need only mention the hurricane Katrina that clearly showed a total lack of interest (except for pro-Bush businessmen who reaped rich rewards) in the fate of poor New Orleans blacks. And of course we have the constant hyping of the fear factor to keep the electorate in line and supportive of the Republican’s murderous and short-sighed policies.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

Huffschmidt's Zionist Connection

Eric Hufschmid’s Connection to Zionist Billionaire Rupert
Murdoch Unraveled!
What follows is a summary of the August 31 broadcast
of Piper’s talk forum on
On the August 31 broadcast of his nightly radio talk
forum on, on the Republic Broadcasting
Network, American Free Press correspondent Michael
Collins Piper addressed what he called "The Hufschmid
Conundum," the puzzle surrounding the bizarre attacks
by Eric Hufschmid on many longtime anti-Zionist
writers and activists including Piper himself (and his
colleagues at American Free Press and The Spotlight)
as well as individuals such as Mark Glenn, Mark
Farrell, David Duke and many, many others too numerous
to mention.
Piper quoted a letter writer who said correctly that
"Eric spends most of his time making false allegations
against many good people. he seldom has any proof, yet
he boldly releases his ideas or opinions as fact, and
directly attacks 'the mark' of the day. Eric is always
assuming his mark as guilty until proven innocent."
Piper noted that although Hufschmid is constantly
attacking people as "Zionists" or as "Zionist agents,"
Hufschmid himself had little, if anything, to say
about the obvious role of Israel and its intelligence
agency, the Mossad, in his own book and video about
Piper noted that Hufschmid literally received millions
of dollars in free publicity regarding his
(Hufschmid's) book on the "Penn and Teller" broadcast
which is a product of the Zionist-controlled
"Showtime" network.
Piper noted that few REAL anti-Zionists ever receive
that kind of publicity and suggested that perhaps the
actual intent of Penn & Teller's "attack" on Hufschmid
was to redirect people to a source on 9-11 that does
NOT emphase Israeli complicity in the attack.
Piper noted the parallel theme in a recent essay by
Sen. John McCain of Arizona, published in the
September issue of POPULAR MECHANICS which suggests
that critics of the U.S. government's 9-11 thesis are
putting the blame on "America" for the attack; in
short, McCain was simply not mentioning the well-known
fact that many (if not most) critics of the U.S.
government lies about 9-11 contend—as American Free
Press journalist Christopher Bollyn has contended from
the beginning—that Israel and its Mossad was the prime
mover behind 9-11. So McCain and Hufschmid have
essentially taken the same approach.
Although Hufschmid talks on his website about an
Israeli connection, it is Hufschmid's book which has
been given the widespread international publicity.
This, said Piper, constitutes a classic "limited
hangout"---that is, giving "some" of the story, but
not "all" of it. That is, Hufschmid falls to emphasize
the strong evidence connecting Israel to the attack.
In the meantime, while pretending to be a supporter of
American Free Press journalist Christopher
Bollyn—Piper's longtime friend and colleague—Hufschmid
has been trying to drive a wedge between Bollyn and
Piper (and between Bollyn and his own employer,
American Free Press) by telling worldwide audiences
via internet broadcasts and on his lie-packed website
that American Free Press has NOT been publishing
Bollyn's work and trying to suppress it.
Piper previously demonstrated to his audience that
American Free Press had indeed published the articles
by Bollyn that Hufschmid falsely claimed had never
been published, and the one article that was not
immediately published (because it arrived too late)
was later reworked into other material by Bollyn
published by American Free Press.
Unfortunately, many people who don't read either the
published version of "AFP" or its complete on-line
subscription version, have been believing Hufschmid's
lies about Bollyn and AFP and about many other things.
Most of these people also believe Hufschmid's bizarre
and outlandish claim that Piper is a Zionist, despite
the fact that Piper has devoted 26 years of his 46
years to writing and speaking about the dangers of
Zionism, in such books as
FINAL JUDGMENT, detailing the Mossad link to the JFK
assassination conspiracy (over JFK's efforts to stop
israel from building nuclear weapons),
THE HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR, exposing the secret history
of the Zionist neo-conservatives and their drive for
war against Iraq and Iran and Syria and the rest of
the Muslim world,
outlines the amazing power of Zionism in America, and
BEST WITNESS, which tells the story of Mel
Mermelstein's efforts to break the back of the
Holocaust Revisionist movement—an effort which failed
and failed badly.
In addition, Piper noted, AFP (and The SPOTLIGHT
before it) have published literally hundreds—maybe a
thousand?—of articles by Christopher Bollyn focusing
on the intrigues of Israel and the Zionist movement,
proving, beyond any question, that Hufschmid is lying
when he says that AFP is trying to suppress either the
works of Bollyn—whom Piper has always called "the best
journalist in America, bar none"—or discussion of the
subject of Zionism.
Piper believes that "The Hufschmid Conundrum" can be
explained by the fact, as Hufschmid himself admitted
in an article on his website, that Hufschmid's
half-sister is married to the son of Zionist
billionaire Rupert Murdoch. This was early on and
Hufschmid actually suggested that Murdoch himiself may
have been aware of Hufschmid's work.
Incredibly, though, Hufschmid makes the lame
suggestion that Murdoch—one of the most powerful
Zionists on the face of the planet—may be one of the
"good" guys (of all things). Hufschmid even said that
he knew little about Murdoch until Murdoch's
publication, THE WEEKLY STANDARD, edited by Zionist
neo-conservative William Kristol (exposed thoroughly
in Piper's book THE HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR) had requested
a copy of Hufschmid's book.
Hufschmid's bizarre "explanation" of the "connection"
between himself and Murdoch, in Piper's estimation,
was simply a clever concoction by Hufschmid to explain
away his Murdoch connection in a blizzard of words in
order to cover up the fact that he (Hufschmid) was
actually being promoted by the Murdoch empire in order
to maintain a handle on "the controlled opposition"
surrounding speculation regarding the 9-11 terrorist
attacks, focusing attention on a book that talked
about the forensics of the 9-11 attacks but keeping
the lid on the Zionist connection to that tragic
Piper suggested that Hufschmid certainly knew that
once his name came into the fore that people would
(quite correctly) start researching into the name
"Hufschmid" and ultimately discover the
Hufschmid-Murdoch connection and that this was
Hufschmid's way of laying it on the table in a
relatively confusing way that would convince some
gullible people that Hufschmid was a "real" truth
seeker. But Hufschmid himself actually raised the
question as to whether he himself was being used in
some "psy-ops" by the Murdoch empire and the Zionist
Piper commented that this was a classic Mossad tactic:
"hiding in plain sight." In other words, Hufschmid put
the Murdoch connection out there so that if anyone
ever questioned him on it—as people are now doing, and
rightly so—he could say, "Oh I never kept it a
Piper also noted the interesting fact that Hufschmid's
attack on Piper and American Free Press and the
campaign to split off AFP's star reporter—Christopher
Bollyn—from AFP, and thereby deprive AFP of Bollyn's
reportage, came precisely at the time when AFP was
about to launch its international conference on Labor
Day weekend featuring a historic seminar on the Lies
of 9-11, with Bollyn as well as famed 9-11 hero and
World Trade Center survivor, William Rodriguez, and
Ellen Mariani, widow of 9-11 victim Neal Mariani.
What better way, Piper asked, than to disrupt a major
event to be attended by some 300 people including some
from around the world?
Piper also noted that some time ago Hufschmid had also
been privy to Piper's then-manuscript (which Hufschmid
knew was soon to be published) entitled THE JUDAS
GOATS, which features an entire chapter devoted to the
subject of how Rupert Murdoch and his media empire
(including Fox News) had been set up by the
billionaire Zionist families Rothschild, Oppenheimer
and Bronfman to provide a "controlled" so-called
"conservative alternative"—that is, a classic
"controlled opposition"—to the Zionist-dominated
"liberal" networks such as ABC, CBS, and NBC.
Hufschmid knew that publication of THE JUDAS GOATS
would be the first time that the nationalist-patriot
movement would see the ENTIRE Murdoch story outlined
in the context of a detailed book describing how the
Zionist movement had worked for years to infiltrate
and destroy the nationalist movement in America, that
many thousands of people would read about Murdoch, in
detail, for the first time and learn the truth of
"who" is really behind this media empire (with which
Hufschmid is intimately connected): his half-sister is
an heir, by marriage, to billions in Zionist money.
Hufschmid, thus, was rightly concerned that as more
and more people learned about Murdoch that they would
start doing their own research and discovering the
Hufschmid connection.
Clearly, says Piper, Hufschmid NEEDED to discredit
Piper and American Free Press and damage their
relationship with Christopher Bollyn.
Piper pointed out that he had been writing about
Murdoch for many years, going back to the early 1980s
when he wrote about Murdoch in The SPOTLIGHT
newspaper, utilizing "inside" data about Murdoch from
one of Murdoch's former Australian associates,
international businessman and prominent Catholic
layman, Henry Fischer, long known for his close ties
to the traditionalist Catholic movement and for his
intimate connections to anti-Zionist elements inside
the Vatican and the Catholic Church worldwide. Fischer
is even mentioned, Piper noted, in several books by
mainstream authors about Murdoch.
But Fischer's "inside" information on Murdoch's
Rothschild-Oppenheimer-Bronfman connection, making him
part of the "Billionaire Gang of Four," is never
mentioned in those “mainstream” volumes!
All of this taken together explains the truth about
"The Hufschmid Conundrum."
Piper urged people to provide financial support
directly to Christopher Bollyn in assisting Bollyn in
his legal case against the police state thugs who
attacked him and hit him with a life-threatening taser
gun in his own front yard in Hoffman Estates,
Contributions made out to "Christopher Bollyn" can be
sent to AFP, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, #100,
Washington, DC 20003.
MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER can be reached at