Monday, November 14, 2005

9/11 End Game

Monday, November 14, 2005
9-11 End Game
We are finally there: the idea that explosives felled the Twin Towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center has now become mainstream.

Specifically, Dr. Steven Jones, the physics professor from Brigham Young University, was interviewed by Utah's largest television network. Moreover, the rumor is that Dr. Jones will be on MSNBC's Tucker Carlson show and will say that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition. Even if the rumor is untrue, Jones is being interviewed by media outlets throughout the country, and the word from him, David Ray Griffin, and others about the controlled demolition of the trade centers is getting real coverage.

The perpetrators of the 9-11 attacks and their allies undoubtedly long-ago realized that the truth about the bombs in the towers would eventually come out. Therefore, I can guarantee that they've thought of a cover story to deal with this eventuality: namely, that Osama and the boys planted explosives in the buildings.

I have kept quiet about this for many months, as I did not want to telegraph our punch too early. But, after many months of reflection, here are my thoughts:

(1) The story that Al-Qaeda planted bombs logically fails. First of all, a couple of truck bombs wouldn't have done it. It took a coordinated and controlled demolition, involving bombs in the basements and throughout the buildings. Controlled demolitions of large buildings take many months of planning, expert timing, and complete control and coordination.

(2) The Twin Towers were some of the world's largest buildings, and they were demolished with near perfection, causing very little damage to surrounding buildings. This is not something that a bunch of rag-tag terrorists could have done on their own, PERIOD.

(3) Additionally, the sudden "straightening out" of the upper 34 floors of the South Tower after they had precipitously leaned over and started toppling like a tree could ONLY have been accomplished through very sophisticated demolition techniques. There are only a handful of demolition experts in the world who could have pulled this off. Osama and the boys? Impossible.

(4) Security for the trade centers was provided by a Bush-linked company. How did a couple of nobody-terrorists, unconnected with the resources of the United States (or Israel) have gained the access necessary to have installed the infrastructure to implement these controlled demolitions?

(5) Even if the first tower had been brought down by Al-Qaeda, why didn't the government jam the radio frequencies or cell phones which would have been needed to orchestrate the controlled demolition of the second tower and of building 7? Why didn't they send in an AWACS plane and jam all communications signals in a 2-square mile radius?

(6) Why were people ordered back up the stairs and told they would be safe in the Towers? If Al-Qaeda had planted bombs, wouldn't the government haven't gotten people the heck out of the buildings? Why didn't helicopters rescue as many people as possible? Why didn't the government use firefighting planes and helicopters to drop water on the towers and extinguish both the fires and -- maybe -- the electronic equipment needed to set off the explosives?

The answer to these questions might be they needed sufficient casualties to inflict mass fear in the American public so as to justify the imperial wars and suspension of liberty.

(7) Why did the 9-11 Commission and NIST lie and say fires brought down the buildings? This is evidence of guilt, and a cover-up. "We didn't want to scare the people" does not cut it.

Bright people will undoubtedly be able to add many points to this short list. But this alone should wholly refute the coming story that Al-Qaeda done it, and help us win the 9-11 end game.


Post a Comment

<< Home